# Maps & Scenarios

> Canonical HTML: https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/appendices/maps-scenarios
> Markdown mirror: https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/appendices/maps-scenarios/index.html.md
> Route: /initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/appendices/maps-scenarios
> Source: app/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/appendices/maps-scenarios/page.mdx
> Generated: 2026-04-09T23:01:26.288Z

[Open the HTML page](https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/appendices/maps-scenarios)

# Maps & Scenarios

This appendix serves as a placeholder for reference maps and scenario walkthroughs. It keeps geographic and scenario-specific material out of the core narrative while providing a centralized location for operational visual aids and stress-test results.

## Map Annexes (Reference-Only)

Maps in this section provide the spatial context for monitoring, voting, and reconstruction.

### 1. Freeze Phase Mapping
- **Ceasefire Scope and Geography:** Delineation of lines, buffer zones, and deconfliction sectors.
- **Humanitarian Corridors:** Primary and alternate routes for aid and civilian movement.
- **Protected Infrastructure Register (PIR):** Visual overlays of critical energy, water, and medical sites (subject to security redaction rules).

### 2. Vote & Rebuild Mapping
- **Observation Deployment:** Maps showing intended vs. actual observer coverage to detect "blind spots."
- **Reconstruction Clusters:** Geographic grouping of recovery projects and logistics corridors.

> **Security Note:** Publishing precise coordinates can create targeting risks. Public versions of this GitBook must use generalized maps, while precise GIS layers are kept restricted to verified monitors and governance bodies.

## Scenario Walkthroughs

Scenario walkthroughs illustrate how the **Freeze–Vote–Rebuild** framework behaves under stress. These are used to calibrate gates and train personnel.

### Scenario A: High-Severity Violation During Freeze
- **Process:** Incident report intake $\rightarrow$ S4 classification $\rightarrow$ technical verification $\rightarrow$ adjudication.
- **Outcome:** Triggering of the escalation ladder and immediate pause of the current incentive tier.

### Scenario B: Monitor Access Denied
- **Process:** Obstruction logged as high-severity violation $\rightarrow$ automatic review trigger $\rightarrow$ fallback to technical/satellite verification.
- **Outcome:** Failure of the "Monitor Access" gate and suspension of the next funding tranche.

### Scenario C: Coercion Cluster During the Vote
- **Process:** Pattern of intimidation detected via observer reports and hotlines $\rightarrow$ investigation by the Dispute Panel.
- **Outcome:** Invalidation of results in affected precincts and scheduled re-runs.

### Scenario D: Reconstruction Fraud Discovered
- **Process:** Audit flag on procurement $\rightarrow$ investigation by the Reconstruction Authority $\rightarrow$ debarment of vendor.
- **Outcome:** Suspension of project tranches and implementation of a remediation plan.

## Template: Scenario Write-up
*Use this structure when adding new stress-test scenarios:*

- **Trigger Event:** The initial incident or violation.
- **Actors and Roles:** Who reports, who verifies, who adjudicates.
- **Timeline:** Sequence of actions from $T_{0}$ to resolution.
- **Gate Impact:** Does this cause a gate to pass, fail, or pause?
- **Consequences:** Which incentives are rolled back or suspended?
- **Lessons:** How should the **Risk Register (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/risks/risk-register)** or **KPIs (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/toolkit/metrics-kpis)** be adjusted?

## Internal Links
- **Incident Workflows:** Freeze Monitoring (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/freeze/verification-monitoring)
- **Escalation Logic:** Escalation Ladder (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/governance/escalation-coordination)
- **Vote Integrity:** Integrity & Observation (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/vote/integrity-observation)
- **Rebuild Accountability:** Accountability & Transparency (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/rebuild/accountability)

## Drafting Note
When this appendix is fully populated, maintain two versions:
1. **Public:** Generalized maps and non-sensitive scenarios.
2. **Restricted:** Precise coordinates, monitor deployment details, and sensitive infrastructure layers.