# The Proposal at a Glance

> Canonical HTML: https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/proposal-at-a-glance
> Markdown mirror: https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/proposal-at-a-glance/index.html.md
> Route: /initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/proposal-at-a-glance
> Source: app/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/proposal-at-a-glance/page.mdx
> Generated: 2026-04-09T23:01:26.288Z

[Open the HTML page](https://initkoa.org/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/proposal-at-a-glance)

# The Proposal at a Glance

**Freeze–Vote–Rebuild** is a sequenced, verification-first framework designed to move from active war to a legitimate political outcome and large-scale reconstruction.

It separates three problems that are often entangled:
1. **Stopping violence** (Freeze)
2. **Establishing legitimate political authority** (Vote)
3. **Restoring lives and infrastructure at scale** (Rebuild)

The intent is to create a process that is **auditable**, **conditional**, and **reversible** if compliance breaks—rather than a one-shot bargain that depends on trust.

## The Three Phases (High-Level)

### Freeze
Stop major combat operations under a monitored arrangement that includes:
- defined ceasefire terms,
- verification and incident reporting,
- deconfliction mechanisms,
- humanitarian protections and protected infrastructure.

### Vote
Run a supervised legitimacy process that:
- defines the electorate (including displaced persons),
- uses credible voting and auditing procedures,
- establishes integrity safeguards against coercion and manipulation,
- may include a published “vote-to-border” method if outcomes translate into lines.

### Rebuild
Unlock reconstruction at scale through:
- transparent governance and procurement,
- performance-based delivery incentives (“Reconstruction Olympics”),
- auditing, public reporting, and anti-capture safeguards,
- sequenced economic restart (energy, transport, housing, services).

## Verification-First: The Operating Logic

The proposal is built around **gates**:
- Each phase has entry/exit criteria measured by observable indicators.
- Benefits (sanctions relief, aid tranches, reconstruction funds) can be **tied to verified compliance**.
- Violations trigger predefined responses (investigation, escalation ladder, rollback).

This is intended to reduce dependence on trust and increase resilience to spoilers.

## Status-Neutral by Design

The framework is structured to:
- avoid requiring agreement on final status before violence stops,
- use a supervised legitimacy process rather than unilateral declarations,
- keep the mechanism focused on process integrity and verifiability.

“Status-neutral” does not mean “values-neutral”; it means the mechanism does not predetermine outcomes.

## What You Should Read Next

- **Theory of Change (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/theory-of-change)**
- **Phased Timeline (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/phased-timeline)**
- **Core Principles & Red Lines (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/core-principles)**
- **What This Is Not (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/what-this-is-not)**
- **Deltas Between Versions (/initiatives/ukraine-peace-plan/fvr/overview/deltas)**