Governance
Kristal Farms is infrastructure that touches power, heat, water, network, and community outcomes.
That means “operator discretion” is not enough. The project is designed so that:
- critical priorities are decided explicitly, not implied,
- commitments are written down, not promised,
- and performance is observable, not hidden.
Governance is the mechanism that keeps the project community-aligned, tenant-safe, and environmentally constrained.
The governance stack (four bodies)
Kristal Farms uses four standing bodies. Each operates under a charter defining what it can decide vs what it can recommend.
1) Project Council (steering)
The high-level steering forum where the key parties sit together:
- community representatives,
- public owner (if applicable),
- site operator (host),
- tenant representatives,
- greenhouse operator (if present).
Mandate: overall strategy, budget approvals, compliance with agreements, and escalation for major disputes.
2) Heat Committee (heat-first operations)
A committee dedicated to heat allocation and the heat-first rule.
Mandate:
- set seasonal heat priorities (e.g., clinic/school first in winter),
- approve the list and timing of heat sinks (including greenhouse windows),
- review heat logs and curtailment events,
- recommend operational adjustments based on weather and demand.
Related:
3) Environment Committee (ecological limits)
A committee responsible for environmental compliance and incident review.
Mandate:
- monitor discharge temperature delta (ΔT) and other agreed limits,
- oversee monitoring on flows and water quality indicators,
- review environmental incidents and mitigation,
- trigger operational responses when constraints tighten (e.g., low flow periods).
Related:
4) Kristals Council (knowledge commons)
A committee governing the public-interest knowledge outputs associated with the project.
Mandate:
- select public-interest topics,
- validate quality/appropriateness before publication,
- oversee update cadence and usage metrics,
- enforce the “black-box boundary” (no private tenant data, no personal data; only consented/public sources).
Related:
Decision rights (who controls what)
A simple principle: operations are technical; priorities are civic.
- The operator runs utilities and safety procedures (power, cooling, alarms, access control).
- tenants run workloads inside their pads.
- the community, through governance, controls the priorities and commitments:
- heat allocation priorities,
- environmental limits and response policies,
- community benefit mechanisms,
- transparency and reporting obligations.
This prevents drift into “we’ll decide later” governance.
Agreements that make governance real
Governance is backed by enforceable agreements. Typical documents include:
- Pad lease + SLA: defines interfaces and service levels (power, cooling handoff, fiber handoff, yard rules), plus step-in rights for safety.
- Heat supply agreement: defines delivery bands, metering, curtailment order, and reserved social-use heat allocations.
- Fiber service agreement: defines network availability/latency expectations and maintenance notice requirements.
- Community Benefits Agreement (CBA/IBA): defines local hiring/training, procurement preferences, community fund mechanisms, and reporting.
Governance committees use these as their “source of authority” for decisions and audits.
Related:
Kristal Farms is intended to operate on a community-first engagement process consistent with Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC):
- inform early,
- consult and incorporate feedback,
- obtain formal consent before build/power-on,
- and hold periodic reviews to renew or reassess consent over time.
This is treated as a continuing condition of legitimacy, not a one-time checkbox.
Transparency & reporting (how accountability is enforced)
Governance without visibility becomes theater. Kristal Farms therefore uses:
- a public-facing dashboard/scorecard (monthly or near real-time summaries),
- published meeting summaries (and minutes where appropriate),
- quarterly reviews across committees,
- and an annual public report covering technical + community benefit metrics.
Related:
Grievance and dispute resolution
The governance model includes a formal path for conflicts and complaints:
- a clear channel for community members to raise concerns,
- defined response timelines,
- escalation to the Project Council when needed,
- and the option for mediation as specified in agreements.
The goal is to prevent silent resentment and ensure problems are handled while they are still solvable.
Why this matters
Kristal Farms is not only a technical site. It is a long-lived relationship between:
- a community,
- tenants,
- an operator,
- and the local environment.
Governance is the mechanism that keeps that relationship explicit, measurable, and correctable.
Next:
