Kristal Farms is infrastructure with a civic claim. That claim must be measurable.
The dashboard exists for one reason: to replace trust with verification. It shows whether the project is delivering what it promised—heat reuse, environmental compliance, reliability, and tangible community benefit.
The point is not perfect numbers. The point is honest feedback loops.
Useful heat delivered
How much heat is actually delivered to real uses: public buildings, homes, greenhouse.
Heat Utilization Factor (HUF)
A simple ratio: how much of the available server heat becomes useful heat, rather than being rejected.
Heat-first compliance
Evidence that operations respect the hierarchy: reuse → store → reject.
See: Heat-first design →
PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness)
How much overhead exists around IT load.
Diesel avoided / resilience outcomes
If backup generation is used, it’s logged. If diesel dependency drops over time, that’s reported.
Capacity + utilization
Pad occupancy, power draw per pad, and how it evolves by phase.
WUE (Water Usage Effectiveness)
Kristal Farms aims for minimal/near-zero water consumption where cooling design allows.
Discharge compliance (ΔT caps)
Any heat rejection must stay within environmental constraints. Compliance is measured continuously.
Incident log
Any threshold breach is recorded with:
See: Cooling & water →
Uptime by subsystem
Mean time to repair (MTTR)
How quickly faults are resolved.
Safety events
The goal is not “no failures.” It’s fast detection, safe degradation, and transparent recovery.
Kristal Farms is also a connectivity project.
Backbone availability
Latency and packet loss (service-level)
Redundancy status (when applicable)
See: Fiber & network →
These metrics are intentionally concrete:
If the project claims civic value, it must report civic results.
Public reporting is not a marketing page. It is a civic report.
Data only matters if someone is responsible for acting on it:
See: Governance →
Targets differ by phase:
The dashboard should always show:
See: Phasing →